tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4357793224370188597.post6606287004201626471..comments2024-02-25T03:15:48.893-05:00Comments on News and Views by Chris Barat: Comics Reviews: DISNEY'S HERO SQUAD #7 and WIZARDS OF MICKEY #7 (July 2010, Boom! Kids)Chris Barathttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06845538037091279990noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4357793224370188597.post-52005624494381035552010-08-06T04:32:01.647-04:002010-08-06T04:32:01.647-04:00>>Hey, if Donald can enjoy stints as a super...>>Hey, if Donald can enjoy stints as a superspy and (so I hear) as a kung fu expert in DONALD DUCK AND FRIENDS, why can't Mickey don different creative chapeaux in "his" title?<br /><br />Partly I agree with you. I don't agree about publishing WoM. WoM is rubbish! Look at INDUCKS, it states "story rated 6.1/10 with 42 votes (rank: 17669)". I'd publish La Saga della spada di ghiaccio (litterally "Ice Sword Saga"): first episode (Mickey Mouse and the Ice Sword, 1982, 102 pages) "story rated 8.8/10 with 93 votes (rank: 23)"; second episode (Mickey Mouse and the Argaar tournament, 1983, 81 pages) "This story is rated 8.7/10 and ranked 40/18181 according to COA users."; third episode (Mickey Mouse and the return of the Prince of the Mists, 1984, 57 pages) "This story is rated 8.7/10 and ranked 53/18181 according to COA users."; fourth and last episode (Mickey Mouse and the sleeping beauty in the cosmos, 1993, 66 pages) "This story is rated 7.9/10 and ranked 4779/17669 according to COA users." This saga is far better than WoM!!! Boom could publish many wonderful italian stories among INDUCKS Top 100 http://coa.inducks.org/recommend.php?top100=1 and reprints of Barks, Gottfredson and Don Rosa, and instead they decided to choose to publish WoM, Ultraheroes and other rubbish stories (Casty's stories are an exception).Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com