tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4357793224370188597.post3545852193284746372..comments2024-02-25T03:15:48.893-05:00Comments on News and Views by Chris Barat: Haven't We Seen These Tales Before?Chris Barathttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06845538037091279990noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4357793224370188597.post-73800448294902579712012-12-06T16:00:56.545-05:002012-12-06T16:00:56.545-05:00Debbie,
Your theory does make sense. The Gemston...Debbie,<br /><br />Your theory does make sense. The Gemstone book did the job so thoroughly, though, that I hope that Rizzoli will at least consult it before putting together its version.<br /><br />ChrisChris Barathttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06845538037091279990noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4357793224370188597.post-52202809025765452262012-12-04T22:51:04.862-05:002012-12-04T22:51:04.862-05:00Looking at the date on your article, the Gemstone ...Looking at the date on your article, the Gemstone book was printed in 2005, and Gemstone is no longer publishing Disney books, so it makes sense that another publisher would reprint these pages seven years later. This new book doesn't kook like it will be as exhaustive as the Gemstone volume, but may be a good opportunity to put these pages back in the public consciousness. Debbie Annehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05648307522331962265noreply@blogger.com